The Poli-Sci of Sci-Fi

A genre of film that has been dismissed for decades by parents as silly futuristic nonsense is science fiction.  Many artists know a simple way to discuss taboo subjects of any nature is to weave them into a fictional story.  It is said that the Grimm Fairy Tales were used to help unify Austria.  How you might ask?  By telling the same stories to the same generation of children helped create a basis for a familiar culture, which that group could identify with.  George Orwell witnessed the rise of Communism after WWII.  His book 1984 paints a dark (yet sadly accurate) future of government control and violence forcing both physical and mental submission of the individual.  The 1950’s was awash with cold war era fears and artists used science fiction as a vehicle to exploit the public’s’ anxieties, with movies such as The Day The Earth Stood Still, Fail Safe, The Thing From Another Planet, Invasion Of The Body Snatchers.

After the turmoil of the 1960’s audiences looked to the hero’s journey in space with the infamous Star Wars franchise.  A long space opera weaving the rise and fall of the German National Socialist Party (A.K.A. Nazis Party) into its backdrop.  In fact the final scene of Star Wars was a shot for shot remake of a famous Nazis propaganda film Triumph of The Will. You can read more on this here http://www.swifteconomics.com/2010/11/11/star-wars-fascism/

Through the 1980’s to the present sci-fi fans have been over saturated with anti-capitalist, anti-corporation, pro Marxist themes.  It started with smaller subversive suggestions and has evolved to blatant implementation of political theory.  The landmark sci-fi film Alien portrays a blue collar group of minors who encounter a vicious alien.  Once the corporation that employs said miners realizes the possible value of the alien specimen they are quick to sacrifice their employees in order to obtain the alien.  The “evil” corporation theme is constant through the entire Alien franchise, portraying any capitalist as bloodthirsty and willing sacrifice anyone in order to make a buck.  The Robocop franchise attempts to tie in “evil” corporations with National Socialist politics, using Nazis Party imagery and having the poor being forced out of Detroit.  A city which has been bankrupted not by capitalists, but by socialist/Marxist ideology in real life.  Nevertheless filmmakers paint the capitalist as the antagonist.  In recent years this anti-corporate/anti-capitalist theme intensified with the Resident Evil franchise and Avatar.

Today Sci-fi has pushed beyond simple underlying themes to the realm of political propaganda.  The political theory of Vladimir Lenin is this “the belief in the necessity of a violent overthrow of capitalism through communist revolution, to be followed by a dictatorship of the proletariat (working class) as the first stage of moving towards communism, and the need for a vanguard party to lead the proletariat in this effort—developed into Marxism–Leninism, a highly influential ideology.”  That being said what are the major concepts of Elysium, In TIme, Snowpiercer, The Day After Tomorrow, Contagion, even The Matrix trilogy?  For Elysium, Snowpiercer, and In Time it is almost verbatim to Lenin’s political theory. Violent overthrow of the upper class in order to establish a communist system.  Sounds pretty sexy?  That is until you read about the actual history of communism and the amount of death that followed.  A fact that hollywood will never portray is that communism is responsible for more human carnage throughout history than any war or revolution, more than the crusades, more than the holocaust.  People will respond well it is a good movie, or I just wanna see the effects which is anyone’s right to do so.  I endorse the free market of ideas and all ideas are always welcome, no matter how great or terrible people think they are.  I do however fear the overwhelming tide of marxist ideology being washed over audiences in recent years and as Mr. Orwell foretold.  I too fear the future.  I close with this quote from one of the greatest propagandists of the twentieth century.  “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” – Joseph Goebbels

Movie Picks to Celebrate American Independence

4th-1-graphic

You cannot celebrate the 4th without films portraying the American Revolutionary War.  One of our longest wars in American History.  Mel Gibson’s The Patriot is a great starting place for the war.  The battles are epic and the desperation of fighting a guerrilla war in the southern colonies is captured very well.  Two mini-series that encompass the entire era HBO’s John Adams and CBS’s 1980’s mini-series George Washington (which is no longer in print, but you can buy DVD rips of the VHS tapes) which covers Washington’s entire life and is considered to be one of the best portrayals of him on-screen.  My Netflix pick is about the first skirmish of the war titled April Morning.  These films will help you get a taste of what the founders of this country accomplished.

Films that embody America and have inspired generations are great for remembering our founding and our Heroes who have sacrificed so much to preserve liberty across the globe.  The iconic Patton played by George C. Scott is a cinematic masterpiece giving one of the greatest speeches in film history.  The epic battle of San Juan Hill in John Millius’s Rough Riders has the greatest portrayal of Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt.  Performed by Tom Berenger.  Since I mentioned John Milius let us not forget Red Dawn (both original and remake) is a great reminder for America’s youth.  Last but never least is the one man who will forever be identified with America and that is the one and only “The Duke”  John Wayne.  You could probably just pick any of his films but to hand-pick a few Sands of Iwo Jima, The Green Berets, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance, and a family favorite McClintock.

4th-2-graphic

If violence and battlefields bore you and you want something more for the homefront.  Have  no fear I have a few titles for you.  The Best Years Of Our Lives about three WWII veterans coming home after the war.  This is a must see for any military family.  A Hallmark film called An American Story which is based on actual events.  This film is about veterans who come home from the war find that their town has been corrupted by crooked politicians and war profiteers.  Jimmy Stewart’s Mr. Smith Goes to Washington is the all inspiring tale of good man comes to corrupted government.  Second Hand Lions is a great family film about teaching a young boy about becoming a man.  Finally a true story that can only happen in America is Will Smith in The Pursuit of Happiness is a wonderful reminder of what America is famous for, the place where anyone achieve greatness no matter their race, religion, or status.

There are many more films out there, but I hope this helps you understand why we celebrate Independence Day. “Posterity! You will never know how much it cost the present Generation to preserve your Freedom! I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in Heaven, that I ever took half the Pains to preserve it.”

― John Adams

Let The Season Begin

 

Sorry for the long delay, but with the summer blockbuster season upon us, it is time to catch up.  Let’s start with the Oscars.  Argo and Ben Affleck were given well deserved accolades for best picture.  Daniel-Day Lewis earned another Oscar for his portrayal of Abraham Lincoln in Speilberg’s Lincoln.  The severely over rated Django Unchained won four Oscars including best supporting actor.  Christopher Waltz gave a good performance in one of Quentin Tarantino’s lesser films.  Two movies that were shut out in this year’s Oscars were Moonrise Kingdom and Zero Dark Thirty.  Both films giving great performances spanning two vastly different genres of storytelling were not given the credit they were due.  Zero Dark Thirty displays the hard-hitting and factual story of the CIA’s manhunt of Osama Bin Laden.  The female lead and final raid by Seal Team Six were tremendous and worth the price of admission to see.  Unfortunately, due to the political climate in Hollywood Zero Dark Thirty would not receive the laurels it has rightfully earned.

From the realism to the search for true love in the early 1960’s in Moonrise Kingdom,  Wes Anderson’s  creative story telling and long still shots makes this independent film very Oscar worthy.  The big name ensemble cast of Bill Murray, Bruce Willis, Edward Norton, and Harvey Keitel are reason enough to see this hidden gem.

In Theaters:

Since the Oscars a few movies have peaked my interest and were a pleasure to see in the theaters.  First was the very long anticipated re-make of Sam Rami’s Evil Dead.  For those Bruce Campbell fans and fans of the Evil Dead Trilogy (Evil Dead, Evil Dead II: Dead By Dawn, and Army of Darkness) will find that Campbell and Rami choice of a fresh new director truly paid off.  Keeping what made the original work so well and putting a new twist on it all will please everyone.  Very little computer effects were used in this re-make giving this gore fest a truly realistic experience, so for all you horror fans out there Evil Dead is worth it.

A movie that was sort of brushed off as “Die Hard in the Whitehouse” yet was a pleasant surprise was Gerald Butler in Olympus Has Fallen.  Antoine Fuqua (Training Day, King Arthur, Tears of the Sun, Shooter) directed this action packed film about North Korean terrorist attack on the White House.  Butler, a secret service agent runs to the aid of the president (Bill Pullman).  In a genre that is over saturated with mind numbing action scenes and little character development, this film brings  it back to its roots of a  Olympus Has Fallen provides realistic action with strong character development and desperation portrayed by Butler.

On Netflix:

A great political thriller that is a Netflix Original is House of Cards starring Kevin Spacey.  The first season of House of Cards portrays a disenfranchised democrat senator played by Spacey and his schemes of revenge against the democrat hierarchy that pushed him aside.  House of Cards realistic view of party politics in D.C. makes for great television.

Another movie on Netflix that is worth seeing is For the Greater Glory: The True Story of Cristiada.  Based on real events in Mexico, For The Greater Glory is the story of the Mexican government forcing out the Catholic Church and the freedom fighters who resisted the violent oppression over a century ago.  Andy Garcia’s portrayal of General Enrique Gorostieta and his transformation of faith gives this film a very inspirational story to a greater audience and is very worthy of being placed on your instant que.

 

Worthy DVD/Blu- Rays:

Alex Cross

Critically panned James Patterson’s Alex Cross  comes to the big screen with Tyler Perry facing off against vicious hitman (Mathew Fox).  This movie is another example of why critics should be ignored, because I found it to be suspenseful, intense and engaging thriller.

The Possession

Loosely based on actual events, The Possession is about a Jewish box that contains a demon that possesses and feeds on the souls of children.  Possession/ Supernatural films have become rather popular in recent years and this one is at the top of the list.  The storyline of a broken family dealing with an evil presence is captured in a unique way and will scare even the biggest horror fans.

The Name is Reacher

Seems like every Christmas Season in recent years offers long fantasy epics such as Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, mixed with a typical family Disney animation of some sort. Well for movie fans seeking something different with a great character story, Jack Reacher brings it in spades. Jack Reacher is based on the book One Shot about a former Army military police officer played by Tom Cruise who is in pursuit of a sniper responsible for a mass shooting in Pittsburgh, PA. This film was produced by Cruise and shot on location in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, which makes for a visually rich environment for this film noir.

Critics including Leonard Mauldin are giving Jack Reacher two stars or less which is disappointing for the critics. This is film is a great character piece for Tom Cruise whose on-screen presence is much more in-depth than the Mission Impossible or Bourne Identity movies. Robert Duvall’s character is beyond criticism with his supporting role as a rifle range owner. That being said, the Sandy Hook shooting occurred just two weeks prior to opening weekend for Jack Reacher, keeping many soccer moms away from the box office. This has had a real impact on the money it is taking in, which unfortunately means that there will be little to any chance of a sequel to this movie. The constant complaint from film critics and the public is that there are not enough new and inventive stories in Hollywood anymore, so Tom Cruise helps produce one and it gets crucified for their efforts. This film is rated PG-13 for the action content with a small amount of language to it which makes this a perfect movie for both teen and adult audiences. Critics say that Cabin in the Woods was 2012’s big movie that was missed and being a horror film enthusiast it was a good movie. Unfortunately, in all honesty it’s getting more praise simply because the Avengers director’s name Joss Whedon is tied to it. Jack Reacher is a film that will have a longer shelf life.

I fear this has become the normalcy in Hollywood where even great films such as Jack Reacher, Boondock Saints, even Cabin in the Woods get buried. Not because of their content or the performances, but because someone in corporate doesn’t think it fill their product mold. Granted this is nothing new coming from Hollywood, but many of their mass-produced movies did not do well this year. Most of the movies that are considered to be Oscar contenders are not great movies. That being said ignore critics and box office take and go see Jack Reacher. It was well worth the 10$ ticket.

A New Red Dawn

“We are the government and we are here to help.”  Truly one of the most horrifying concepts within the last two centuries has come to the silver screen as a modern take of John Milius’s Red Dawn.  Milius’s film about a Soviet and Latin invasion/occupation of the United States during the Cold War has been both inspirational and controversial for generations of moviegoers.  Rugged individuals fighting a guerilla war against overwhelming forces in your hometown is a universal theme.  Every zombie film uses the same premise.  What made Red Dawn and its remake different are their patriotic and historical overtones. For example; in the original film the character “Jeb” is named after a famous mountain man who hunted, trapped, and fought Indians off when America was still expanding west. Milius loves to write about when men lived by their own means without laws or government, just by their own word and the gun by their side.  The remake of Red Dawn brings the audience back to this rugged scenario with a combat veteran teaching survivors how live in this new world without the comforts of civil society.

Original Trailer

Conservatives, libertarians, historians, and veterans love movies that promote these ideals and give audiences a glimpse at why we resist things in this world that are forced upon us.  This is why criticisms of both the original Red Dawn and the remake are very scathing.  The majority of American film critics are very liberal both socially and politically.  The art they review is created by an industry that is very liberal.  This is more than just conjecture on my part, because there are just too many polls out there that state otherwise.  The original was criticized as being right-wing paranoia, as well as being called; Fascism and pro-gun nationalism insulting the Soviets.  The new version suffered the same fate from critics some saying the acting was terrible, which is a legitimate argument until you watch the actual film.  The remake of Red Dawn has some great veteran actors and actresses in it portraying the situation with great realism showing the immaturity of youth, desperation, coping with loss, and warrior’s spirit.  Other criticisms were made by rather pro-communist, pro North Korea reviewers stating how terrible the portrayal of the North Korean military occupation is in the film.  This should not be a surprise to anyone out there. When dealing with progressive communism, people only see government for the free stuff they get and forget about the trail of bodies their theories leave behind.  My example comes from Anthony Herbert’s book Soldier about his time fighting the Korean War.  He details in his book finding friends he came across on patrol that were nailed to doorways and their entrails leading out into the ice and snow. That is what progressivism offers us.

Remake Trailer

Regardless of the bad reviews the original Red Dawn became a staple for generations of American youth giving them a fictional glimpse of what real freedom fighters had to endure all over the world and throughout history.  Milius is a true torch-bearer preserving America’s individualism and self-reliance for future generations in hopes that they will never forget their birthright. The original Red Dawn is available on Blu-Ray and on Netflix.  The remake even though it lacks some of the desperation of the original film has some intense plot scenes of betrayal and loss which makes for a great version, with an ending that is truly motivating.  A great movie quote that sums up both films comes from Ridley Scott’s Gladiator. Quintus, “A people should know when they are conquered.”  Maximus, “Would you, Quintus? Would I? “

From My Cold Dead Hands!


After enjoying all of the Halloween treats that the season has to offer, it is time to take stock in one of my favorite genres of film, the zombie/apocalypse.  Zombies, alien invasions, breakdown of society films all have a few things in common.  Each story is essentially a survival story where survivors have beaten the odds of disease, famine, occupation, genocide, nuclear annihilation and are trying to establish a new world in the ashes of the old.
This concept of building a new world out of the proverbial wilderness is something entirely unique to Americans.  Since the United States is a rather new to the world stage, it took over a century and a half for us to settle and establish American society.  It is due to our unique history and culture that we have created the modern zombie film.  Everyone knows that George A. Romero and John A. Russo created Night of the Living Dead propelling tales of a mysterious disease that animates the recently deceased back to life and craving human flesh, which in turn caused society and communication to break down.  That is until men and women pick up their weapons and band together fighting creatures and others who might transgress upon them.  This theme of guerrilla resistance saturates Romero’s blockbuster sequel Dawn of the Dead.  Another reason why this type of film is so popular and definitively American is that the United States of America is the only nation in the world that has written down in the Bill of Rights that the civilian population has a right to own military arms.  It is in our nation’s DNA to be the ”armed to the teeth” underdog, and our zombie films reflect that.  From Romero’s Night of the Living Dead series to Robert Kirkman’s very popular The Walking Dead the everyday use of firearms harkens back to pioneer days with musket, knife, and tomahawk strapped on every able-bodied person.


A great comparison is the remake of Dawn of the Dead and the British 28 Days Later.  In Dawn of the Dead a band of survivors shoot their way to a fortified position (the mall).  While in 28 Days Later, survivors barely make it to a military checkpoint in which they are subject to their abuse because in the real world the people with guns make the rules.
American survival not only permeates the horror genre, but sci-fi and action too.

TV shows such as Falling Skies and Revolution show America in two different circumstances.  One has us in a resistance against an alien occupation, Falling Skies, and the other tells the story of an America without electricity, which causes a breakdown in government.  Both shows display America’s will for armed resistance.  Even shows such as Jericho, Red DawnThe Terminator franchise, and Last Resort all display our romantic notion of defiance and our love for the rugged individual. Even with overwhelming odds and when all hope is lost there will always be that American who will cowboy up and give your enemies a little John Wayne.  To quote another apocalyptic movie Reign of Fire, “Envy the country that has heroes, I say pity the country that needs them.”

Falling to Pieces

Well summer has set and the cool breeze of fall has transformed our lush green landscape to beautiful red and orange colors of October.  This is my favorite season of the year, where everyone becomes a fan of the horror genre.  Fortunately, I am happy to report that the horror genre is alive and well all year round.  Instead of just having your basic monster movie marathon for Halloween night, the genre has spread through all mediums for different audiences and different sub-genres.  All genres of tv and film expand and contract through the decades.  For those of us who are children of the 1980’s, we grew up during the tidal wave of “slasher film” movies.  Halloween, Friday the 13th, Nightmare on Elm Street, Texas Chainsaw Massacre are all heavy weight franchises that hit their stride in the 80’s.  Even with bad reviews and very thin plot mechanisms rubber latex and fake blood ruled the silver screen making these one man teenager garbage disposals into the new “Universal Monsters” for the next generation.

By the late 80’s into the early 90’s the slasher film died a slow painful death making way for more psychological/supernatural thrillers such as The Silence of the Lambs, Hideaway, The Prophecy, Hellraiser, Candyman, Seven, Village of the Damned, Interview with a Vampire, Lord of Illusions, and The Sixth Sense.  These films all had rather large production budgets, solid plot structures, and veteran actors.  Yet, with all the money spent on the pseudo horror genre films of the 90’s, horror was on the decline.  Until Wes Craven’s Scream was released which jump started the horror into the new millennium.  Throughout the 2000’s horror came roaring back with major studio slasher remakes Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Halloween.  Horror sub-genres were brought front and center breaking box office records and is bringing flocks of people to the theaters.  All genres of horror are represented.  You have gory films like the Saw franchise.  Supernatural thrillers such as Paranormal Activity, The Skeleton Key, Exorcism of Emily Rose, Lost Souls, and Dead Silence.  Monster based horror using every creature possible; vampires, werewolves, zombies, and ghouls all earning major praise and box office credits.

Today we are still surfing the high tide of the horror genre, not only the big screen but with the invention of streaming media online via Netflix finding older genre films that are now getting a rebirth of interest from old fans and a younger new audience watching them for the first time.  Horror has also taken its popularity and transformed it to television with shows like Dexter, True Blood, Supernatural, The Vampire Diaries, The Walking Dead, Grimm, and Being Human to name a few.  Horror genre has even made a home in reality TV as well, making searching for the real sightings of the supernatural.  Ghost Hunters and Paranormal State are shows that try to give the viewer proof of an afterlife.

The question now is where does horror go from here?  Will this over saturation of the entire genre lead to a major decline?  Will audiences get tired of the same old clichéd archetypes?  My answer is yes there will come a time when horror  rescinds its bloody hands.  Even now with movie companies simply just remaking every genre film they can think of just to make a dollar is clearly killing audiences off.  At the same time new ideas are being cultivated sparking interest in more independent films bringing something fresh and new to the table.  Just as the summer descends into fall and into the depths of winter, so will horror.  And just when you think it’s over the seeds for a new spring will sprout bringing life back into the genre.  So to all you horror fans out there enjoy your day in the sun for it will soon turn into fall.

That’s the Truth! Truth!

If you are not sure where I got the title for this post. Here is the commercial that inspired me.

“Truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it and ignorance may deride it, but, in the end, there it is.” Sir Winston Churchill. I fondly remember in my documentary film class having the discussion of truth in documentary film. What surprised my counterculture classmates was how the Dr. started this conversation. Our professor was a child of the 1960’s and he discussed how people violently attacked his anti-war friends in college. He had my classmates in awe of all his flower power days and rightly so, those were turbulent times and to be thought of a revolutionary is a romantic notion. Well as the saying goes, “Discretion is a better part of valor,” so I sunk a little lower in my seat preparing for a long course on liberalism. Then after a screening of Michael Moore’s Roger & Me our professor described how Moore rearranged some actual events in his film to fit the narrative that he was striving for. This was not a true documentary and all those sad hipster faces in the crowd felt a little betrayed by our professor and possibly by their own ideology. They had their Matrix moment where they wake up to reality. To this day this I have nothing but respect for this professor.
This backstory will help us discuss the state of documentary film today and as a genre of film, are we getting the truth? When Michael Moore accepts the Oscar for Bowling for Columbine, a film that did not meet the requirements to be considered by the Academy Awards, truth comes into question. One of the requirements this documentary did not meet was the specific number of actual theaters it was screened in. For the 75th Academy Awards I believe it was rule 12 for documentary film. This film should have never been considered for nomination, yet it wins the Oscar. Then in typical fashion with all of Mr. Moore’s films, once people who are in his films see the final product they tend to find a lawyer and file charges for libel. And with a little bit of cinematic fairy dust, Moore’s films easily change from being under the respected description of “documentary” to your basic “fictional” genre in order to save face and charges. Yet, when you read reviews about these films it is nothing but unbridled praise as being the greatest documentary work without anyone asking is what I am seeing true? To quote Thomas Jefferson, “Question with boldness even the existence of God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear.” Our responsibility as the audience is to question what we are seeing.
Being a history buff I love watching The History Channel and they would have great shows such as Conquest where they would discuss and perform different military conquests throughout history. It had great historical value and small taste of reality thrown in. Today when you turn on The History Channel you get shows called Monster Quest and Swamp People programming that has nothing to do with history or documentary. I’m not saying these other shows are bad. I love Swamp People personally but it does not belong on this network. Even South Park used this as parody for one of their shows.

In the last five years or so, documentary films that try and uphold the pillars of truth do exist. If you don’t mind some profanity and a little nudity Penn & Teller’s Bullsh*t brings some truths to light. They are honest about who they are. Two atheist libertarians who strive to bring truths to social issues of the day. Another film which was inspired by the lack of truth in documentary film is Why Michael Moore Hates America. The filmmaker applied Michael Moore’s ambush style of interviewing to the man himself, Michael Moore.

Unfortunately, documentary films similar to Michael Moore Hates America, Indoctrinate U, and EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed, receive very little review or critical praise not because of their lack of truth, but because of the critics’ personal beliefs. Is this the protocol on how documentary films should be judged on?
I remember an independent documentary in college called Human Remains where the creator used stock footage of some of the most horrible dictators in history and used direct quotes as a voiceover for each one of the dictators. It was compelling and true. “Getting it from the horse’s mouth.” Always makes for the best cinema, which brings me to Dinesh D’Souza’s film 2016 the highest grossing political documentary to date. A film that has nothing bad poor reviews by most film critics and disdain throughout Hollywood.

Yet, the facts of this film hold up. Not only by using interviews and actual facts in the right order, but by using President Obama’s words verbatim. Uncut video of the president speaking is impossible to deny. Of course this film will never make it to the Academy Awards even though it will meet all of their requirements and they will not be praised by pop culture or mainstream media, but it will be a keystone holding together the genre of documentary film, Oh and the money too. “And that’s the Truth! Truth!

Victims…. Aren’t We All…

For the last decade and a half I have been noticing a trend in my beloved horror genre.   A trend where the antagonist character isn’t just plain evil, deranged, or some other supernatural phenomena, rather they are driven to their murderous rage.  This type of plot point isn’t bad and can bring complexity to even the basic hack ‘n’ slash film.  The issue is when the audience sees the evolution of the antagonist character into the killer because even for the most deplorable characters, the audience will find sympathy on a subconscious level which takes some of the “horror” and “mystery” out of the film.  A concrete example of this trend was Rob Zombies HALLOWEEN.  This remake of John Carpenter’s classic HALLOWEEN took the fear of a normal person in your average American neighborhood brutally stalking and murdering teenagers that the original film portrayed and replaced it with a child in an extreme abusive household where he developed into the masked killer.  This on screen evolution that Rob Zombie portrayed dilutes the fear element of his film, simply because we as the audience think, “well it’s not his fault.”  The killer is the victim too.  When the audience can find any sort of sympathy for the killer it is no longer horror.  One of the most powerful elements that can be used to invoke fear in an audience is that of the unknown.   In Carpenter’s HALLOWEEN we are never really told why the antagonist is on a murderous rampage, in fact the only thing known about the killer is that he is pure evil.  This storytelling is much more effective with audiences.  Yet, this victimization has become more common in the horror genre.  HOUSE OF WAX remake, SEE NO EVIL, FRIDAY 13Th remake, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: A New Beginning and the list go on.




Now the question I have to pose is why?  Why victimize the antagonist?  One of the reasons why this could be taking place in present day storytelling is the audience.  Film as an art form especially in the horror genre is constantly showing society a reflection of itself.  Maybe we are seeing a reflection of our own society and our love for the victim card.  Every day we are exposed to people doing terrible things to themselves or to others and when they are arrested or dead, we as society treat them as a victim of “insert issue here”. Nobody ever wants to say maybe that person is just evil, or they chose that path and they will reap what they sow.  This moral ambiguity does not
work for the horror genre and is devastating to our society, so the next time you go see a “killer” film.  I hope you see an antagonist that is the darkness, the shadows, and the evil that haunts your dreams and not the bad guy who we all feel sorry for.

The Tea Party Rises

Even though it’s a little late it would be hard to start a film blog without mentioning one of this summer’s biggest films The Dark Knight Rises directed by Christopher Noland.  This film is the third, and hopefully final, installment of the Dark Knight series.  Based on the D.C. Comic anthology, Noland’s final installment does a fairly decent job of breaking the dreaded “rule of sequels”.  In case you do not know what that means let me drop a few titles; JAWS III, LEATHAL WEAPON 3, ALIEN 3, SUPERMAN III, and the list goes on.  That being said Noland paints a city under siege with great scope using beautifully framed shots of epic destruction makes this film perfect for an IMAX experience.  The story has Batman/Bruce Wayne in seclusion due to the events of the previous film and with the Gotham City having almost a decade of peace; political leaders want to replace their “wartime commissioner” commissioner Gordon.   Until a mysterious terrorist named Bane reveals himself to the city and holds them hostage.  Bruce Wayne has to become Gotham’s dark avenger once again even though he is hated for assuming the blame for the death of Harvey Dent.

You may ask so what does this have to do with the Tea Party?  Well first look at the protagonist and antagonist.  You have Bruce Wayne grew up in inherited wealth, which his family has used not only to develop technologies to help America, but mankind as well.  He used his wealth to help a city that was going to ruin, by funding boys homes and hospitals.  His family was never forced to “pay their fair share” they simply tried to help their neighbors.  In reality if you break down the amount of money donated to all charities in the United States you see that conservatives/libertarians donate about 3 to 1 compared to their wealthy liberal counterparts.   Yet with Batman’s wealth at his disposal he takes up arms against injustice, criminal, and corrupt not for glory or power, but for freedom.   This classic story is what America was born from, the rugged individual fighting against the mob, tyranny, oppression, so that individual freedom would prevail.  This ideal is paramount with the Tea Party movement.  Compare this icon with his nemesis Bane.  Bane, an ex-prisoner, enlists the aid of Gotham’s poor and criminal elements to destroy the city from bottom up.   Bane addresses a crowd saying that they are there to give them back freedom and choice by freeing all the convicts out of the city’s jail, as well as sending raiding parties into the homes of the rich in Gotham.  Bane is the epitome of the Bolshevik revolution that took place in Russia over a century ago.  The proletariat destroying the upper class because they feel entitled to other people’s wealth is a common belief held by modern day liberal progressives.  One scene in particular that shows Bane’s lust for class warfare is where wealthy people are forced out to an iced over river and forced to march over it to their deaths.  Compare the occupy Wall Street movement with that of Bane’s mob and you will find many similarities with their hopes of destroying capitalism and free commerce.   The concepts that Bane and Batman embody will help preserve The Dark Knight Rises for future moviegoers.  The only question left is which side do you chose that of the individual, or that of the mob?